Container tax idea gets push from Metro board

Region to explore alternate way to fund TransLink



The idea of slapping a tax on every shipping container that moves through local port terminals will be investigated in detail by Metro Vancouver.

The regional board voted Friday to pursue the concept as a different mechanism to help fund TransLink – one that wouldn’t hit homeowners and motorists, unlike proposals to raise gas taxes or impose road pricing or a vehicle levy.

“There are a lot of transport trucks rolling,” Metro board chair Lois Jackson said. “There’s a lot of money on the table here.”

Richmond Coun. Harold Steves said port expansion is putting more trucks onto local roads, but there’s no mechanism to share in the resulting costs.

He also noted hundreds of acres of farmland have been bought up in recent years for construction of the South Fraser Perimeter Road or for future shipping terminals.

“Most of those containers we know are going farther east,” said Surrey Coun. Linda Hepner, who added the proposal may be a way of getting Ottawa’s attention.

But she questioned whether truckers and shippers should shoulder the fee and persuaded the board to also pursue some sort of direct payment to regional transportation costs from the federal government that would reflect port use.

“Maybe they want to count the containers and give us the money back,” Hepner said. “Maybe that’s the funding process. But taking it to the industry and the port and making the port less competitive, I’m not sure that’s the answer.”

The debate came as the province launched a jobs strategy heavily geared to exporting resources and leveraging traffic through B.C. ports.

About 2.5 million containers a year pass through the port so even a small levy could generate millions toward TransLink’s costs.

Mayors vote Oct. 7 on a proposal to raise gas taxes two per cent to raise $40 million a year and seek other sources – such as a vehicle levy – to raise a further $30 million to build the Evergreeen Line and a broader set of transit upgrades.

Creating a container levy for transit funding would be “sound taxation policy worthy of further analysis,” according to a staff report by Gaetan Royer, Metro’s manager of metropolitan planning.

Heavy, slow-moving container trucks beat up roads and bridges and add to congestion on major arteries, especially near intersections.

A levy that finances more transit and gets more commuter vehicles off the road would free up more space for trucks, Royer’s report suggested.

He also noted 340,000 empty containers pass through the region each year and many more carry lower-value commodities.

A levy that charges those containers more, while giving a break to higher-value cargo, could foster more intensive local industry, Royer suggested.

The province has yet to respond to the idea.

But Port Metro Vancouver “fundamentally opposes” any container levy, according to chief financial officer Allan Baydala.

“It would put an undue burden on this one industrial sector at a time when competing U.S. west coast ports are seeking to increase their market share at Vancouver’s expense,” he said.

Most containers through the port actually move by rail, not road, he noted.

Baydala said port users are already contributing $160 million to help pay for port-related transportation upgrades, including a series of nine railway overpasses that will help reduce road congestion as the number and length of freight trains increases along the Roberts Bank rail corridor.

A container levy was last proposed by TransLink nearly three years ago but rejected by the provincial government on grounds it would risk the port’s competitive position.

TransLink CEO Ian Jarvis said he’s not specifically pursuing the idea right now but added “all options need to be on the table.”

Like any prospective revenue, he said, a container levy would have trade-offs: the potential loss of competitiveness for shippers using Port Metro Vancouver versus the benefit of truckers perhaps more directly contributing to the strain they put on roads.

“There’s some impact there,” Jarvis acknowledged.

But he also noted there may be other mechanisms for goods movers to pay a more equitable share of costs in the future.

Road pricing, he said, could include a differing fee structure for different types of users, including trucks.

Just Posted

Semiahmoo students to raise awareness about acid throwing

The Grade 11 students are to host a fundraiser for victims

Maritimers bring taste of Atlantic Ocean to South Surrey

Maritime Seafoods owner says they cut out the middleman

VIDEO: Surrey Vaisakhi Parade floods Newton streets

Hundreds of thousands of people attended the annual event

Four Surrey students head to New Brunswick for Canada-wide science fair

Three projects move to nationals following regional fair at KPU

VAISAKHI EXPLAINED: Founding of the Khalsa was a seminal event in Sikh history

There are five K’s – articles of faith – worn by baptized Sikhs

‘No answers:’ Canadians react to Sri Lanka bombings that killed hundreds

The co-ordinated bomb attacks killed at least 207 people and injured 450 more on Easter Sunday

RCMP confirm witnesses say body found at Kelowna’s Gyro Beach

Police tape is blocking part of the beach and several RCMP officers are on scene.

Police say ‘no major incidents’ at 4/20, Vancouver Park Board assessing

The first smoke-out held since legalization saw 60,000 people at Vancouver’s Sunset Beach

VIDEO: Langley firefighters spend hours battling blaze in vacant home

Cause of the late-night fire in Willoughby is still under investigation

B.C. fire department rescues kittens

Enderby homeowner not aware kittens in wood pile near garbage pile fire that got out of hand

RCMP looking for witnesses to four-vehicle crash in Burnaby

Police suspect impaired driving was a contributing factor

QUIZ: How much do you know about Easter?

Take this short quiz and put your knowledge to the test

B.C. VIEWS: NDP’s lawyer show is turning into a horror movie

Court actions pile up over pipelines, car insurance, care aides

Most Read